Investor
Good fit · High confidence- Recorded prices are far below adjusted neighbours; check the comparables before reading the Value score as a bargain.
Why it scores well
What holds it back
Details behind each score
- Valuescore 100/100 · weight 20% · +10.0 pts
recorded prices 24% below 355 adjusted comparables of the same property type within 2 km over 12 months (mixed prices; lease adjusted on 355, floor on 355)
transactions, 2026-10-03 · calibration/floor_premium, 2026-09-07 · calibration/lease_decay, 2026-09-07
- Rentalscore 77/100 · weight 20% · +5.5 pts
- Yield
- gross yield 4.2% against a peer median of 4.1%
- 72
- Demand
- 135 contracts over 4 quarters to 2026-06-30, 28 in the latest
- 85
- Net yield
- Not measured
ura_rental, 2026-09-18 · transactions, 2026-10-03
- Resalescore 74/100 · weight 14% · +3.4 pts
- Frequency
- 7.0 resales a year over 12 months (p91 nationally)
- 91
- Buyer pool
- Not measured
- Quantum
- median resale $1,028,888 (p65 of 1-bedroom homes nationally)
- 35
- Competing supply
- Not measured
- Activity
- last resale 2 months ago
- 100
transactions, 2026-10-03
- Future supplyscore 24/100 · weight 10% · -2.6 pts
- Competition risk
- 721 unsold units in 7 selling projects within 2 km, 4038 in 8 listed projects and 0 on 0 land sales sites
- 7
- Unlaunched supply
- 8 listed projects (4038 homes) and 0 Confirmed List sites (0 homes) within 2 km
- Completion timing
- 82 homes expected 2028, 3956 homes expected not stated
- Planned rail
- no planned rail station within 2 km
- 20
- Landuse change
- 129 Master Plan parcels changed class within 2 km (9.8 benefit points)
- 79
ura_devsales, 2026-09-18 · ura_masterplan, 2026-09-20 · lta_datamall, 2026-09-20 · onemap, 2026-09-20
Other reasons in the score
These count too, but move the score less than the reasons above. A reason at 0.0 scored in the middle, so it neither raises nor lowers the score.